Jump to content

Recommended Posts

     If a lawyer is paid in excess of 20, 000, to defend in a criminal matter, and yet this attorney does not put in to suppress any evidence, despite the manner evidence was obtained is classic , first year law school , illegal search and seizure(. While defendant is not at location, car is not in driveway, doors are locked from the outside, curtains all drawn, and landlord opens door for police knowing defendant was not at home).

    Evidence seized was illegal drugs, gun and ammo, and landlord states he was in side earlier and him and his girlfriend the only ones with the key, admit they knew the items recovered were there as they werte inside with the items, and landlords are drug addicts, who wanted wwway to evict tennant who was no where in vicinity, but lawyer does not challenge. ALSO, police searched bldg for several hours and then went and got search warrant, (Like closing barn door after the horses get out.

     Phone calls from another person submitted to grand jury as defendants, with proof positive calls were not defendants, no suppression hearing, or motion for, other false testimony , that could be proved was false, presented to grand jury, no objection by this attorney. Allowed sentence to occur wqithout correcting errors in presentence rep[orts, and this just for starters...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, onlyjoni said:

     If a lawyer is paid in excess of 20, 000, to defend in a criminal matter, and yet this attorney does not put in to suppress any evidence, despite the manner evidence was obtained is classic , first year law school , illegal search and seizure(. While defendant is not at location, car is not in driveway, doors are locked from the outside, curtains all drawn, and landlord opens door for police knowing defendant was not at home).

    Evidence seized was illegal drugs, gun and ammo, and landlord states he was in side earlier and him and his girlfriend the only ones with the key, admit they knew the items recovered were there as they werte inside with the items, and landlords are drug addicts, who wanted wwway to evict tennant who was no where in vicinity, but lawyer does not challenge. ALSO, police searched bldg for several hours and then went and got search warrant, (Like closing barn door after the horses get out.

     Phone calls from another person submitted to grand jury as defendants, with proof positive calls were not defendants, no suppression hearing, or motion for, other false testimony , that could be proved was false, presented to grand jury, no objection by this attorney. Allowed sentence to occur wqithout correcting errors in presentence rep[orts, and this just for starters...

 

I KNOW LAWYERS DON T WANT TO THROW OTHER LAWYERS UNDER THE BUS BUT SOME NEED IT>>>SUCH AS THIS HIGH PRICED FRAUD

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever this happened to needs to file for an appeal based ineffective counsel. That is assuming you have all of the facts straight.

 

If it happens to be you that his all happened to I would suggest you hire an attorney to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, onlyjoni said:

If a lawyer is paid in excess of 20, 000, to defend in a criminal matter, and yet this attorney does not put in to suppress any evidence, despite the manner evidence was obtained is classic , first year law school , illegal search and seizure(. While defendant is not at location, car is not in driveway, doors are locked from the outside, curtains all drawn, and landlord opens door for police knowing defendant was not at home).

 

This isn't a complete sentence.  If....then what?  

 

By the way, what are the qualifications of the person who concluded that "the manner [in which the] evidence was obtained is classic , first year law school , illegal search and seizure"?

 

You didn't ask a question, but if you're asking that we accept that the lawyer's failure to make a motion to suppress fell below the applicable standard of care and are asking what the defendant's remedy is (assuming a conviction resulted), the answer is an appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

 

If there was more that you wanted to know, please be more clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...