Jump to content
afroninjasamurai

Ineffective assistance of counsel ( conflict of interest)

Recommended Posts

Why is it that when attorneys know that they've mismanaged a clients case, in Hawaii the attorneys ban together to protect one another for their own interest, and the State assist this type of behavior by not responding to petitions for post conviction. The State of Hawaii seems to belief that the laws of the land doesn't apply to them, so while waiting I shall get all parties involved some assistance in resolving this particular legal mystery. The Constitution isn't being followed by the officials responsible for upholding the laws of our Country. I'll never understand Hawaii's reasoning with mass-incarceration, especially since the State doeidesn't have a high crime rate. The rate that Hawaii is incarcerating people that actually reside in the State, borders on human trafficing laws. Thus, this type of violation increases the very real possibility of WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes! I would appreciate a response and/or the regulations or rules that govern the response time that the State is bound by. If the State files a Motion for an Extension of Time, which was sixty (60) days why are they noncompliant for over the sixty (60) day of extension. Why must I be left waiting? They certainly didn't wait to wrongfully incarcerate me! I sould have a Right to Due Process and Equal Protection. I most definitely have a Right to be Heard so long as my claims are meritorious, in fact I also have the Right to Petition the Courts! So, again I wish to understand the purpose of the State filing for an extension. Why have to ask for something that was never intended to be followed or honored. What is the use of guidelines or Rules. Which not following what is considered to be the law is the very reason for said petition. Had the State of Hawaii and its prosecutor's obeyed the United States Constitution, I would've never been convicted of such hearsay evidence to begin with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You throw around a whole lot of terms that do not mean what you seem to think that they mean. If you give us the facts, not your assumptions about what laws or legal principles may or may not have been violated, we can try pointing you in the right direction.

 

What did you do which was illegal? Are you awaiting trial or have you been tried and convicted? What is it you are trying to do now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post seems to be nothing but a rant, and you asked no non-rhetorical questions, so I don't understand what the purpose of this thread is.  The rules governing times to respond to motions are publicly available on the internet, and you can google them as well as anyone here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...