Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There was no documentation of the victims injury, pain or bruises by the police officer, EMT or the hospital.

18 days after the incident the victims sisters gave the police a CD containing digital photos of these undocumented bruises.

The sister won't testify to taking the photos, but the prosecution says she don't have to.

Are these photos admissible?

Should an objection be made against these photos during trial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That depends on the rules of evidence for the jurisdiction in which the case will be tried, and you did not specify what jurisdiction that is. Each state, DC, and territory has its own law of evidence, and they do vary. In the jurisdictions I'm familiar with, the photos would not be admissible without laying the proper foundation for them, and to do that the person who took the photos would need to testify about how she took the photos, when she took them, etc. So the key question here is whether the sister is the one who took the photos. Just because she gave them the CD doesn't mean she necessarily took the photos that are on the CD. So perhaps the prosecutor is saying she doesn't have to testify because she didn't take the photos and the prosecutor has the photographer coming to testify. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot fathom that there is "no documentation of the victims injury, pain or bruises by the police officer, EMT or the hospital." 

 

"Are these photos admissible?"

Your/whomever's attorney is free to challenge authenticity/admissibility.

"Should an objection be made against these photos during trial?"

This is a subjective question that's kind of silly.  If someone wants to dispute their authenticity, it would make sense to object to any introduction/submission of them without authentication measures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The sister won't testify to taking the photos, but the prosecution says she don't have to.

Are these photos admissible?

Should an objection be made against these photos during trial?

 

Whether they're admissible or not and whether an objection is appropriate depends on the rules of evidence of the unidentified state in which the prosecution is taking place and on whether a proper foundation is laid for their admission.  We also have to assume the photos are relevant, which I'll do even though you didn't say what crime(s) the defendant is charged with.  At a minimum, someone with personal knowledge will have to testify as to when the photos were taken and, if not apparent from the photos themselves, what they depict.  Some "chain of custody" type testimony probably will also be necessary.  It's not beyond the realm of possibility that someone other than the photographer-sister could provide the necessary testimony.  Keep in mind, by the way, that, if anyone subpoenas the sister to testify, she will have no choice but to do so unless she wants to risk being thrown in jail for contempt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've tagged this for 5 different states, which confuses me because this crime couldn't have taken place in ALL of them. So which state was it? And why in the world did you tag four other states to this question?

Anyway, in at least one of those states, the only thing you need for a photograph to be admissible is for a person with knowledge of the images depicted to testify that they are accurate representations. That's it (other than the contents being relevant to a material issue, but that doesn't seem to be in question here). So, if you have pictures of the scene of a car wreck that you want to enter into evidence, you don't have to have the person who physically took the photographs, so long as another witness who was at the scene testifies that the photos are accurate representations of the scene. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...