Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Guest


Recommended Posts

It is a motion (typically made in federal civil litigation, although the same sort of motion could be made in a state court case) to exclude the testimony of an expert witness on the ground that the expert is not qualified or, more typically, that the expert is testifying on a scientific issue and that his/her testimony is not based on proper scientific theory and/or methods. The name comes from a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993)), in which the Court said that federal district judges should act as "gatekeepers" for expert testimony, rather than letting both sides present experts and letting the jury choose which expert was more believable.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...