Jump to content

pg1067

Members
  • Content Count

    56,808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    180

Everything posted by pg1067

  1. So...you started a new thread to ask a question that was answered in the other thread.... 🤦‍♂️ I told you in the other thread that: "You're in small claims territory. If you get to the point where you feel like you're being jerked around, file a small claims suit."
  2. Could be either. Could be both. Could be neither. Note that most discrimination is legal. Who asked for these things and why?
  3. What does this have to do with the subject of this seven month old thread? Why are you tagging this onto someone else's post -- especially since this seems to be a duplicate of the thread you started yesterday?
  4. Trustee of what? Estates don't have trustees. Is there a trust? At the start of your post, you referred to "the trustee" in the third person. Now you're using the first person. I therefore assume you're "the trustee." Correct? Without any clarity regarding whether you're dealing with an estate or a trust (or both), it would be folly to try and answer your questions with anything other than, "hire a lawyer."
  5. After seven years? You're clearly in way over your head and will need a probate attorney to assist you. Any attempt to walk you through dealing with this would be way beyond the scope of what folks on a message board can do for you.
  6. Here's the text of a private message that the OP sent me: "She was in the hospital when she was due to sign her new lease in July, So we have been following the rules and I have been allowed to stay with her as a temporary care giver. This issue has to deal with are brother who visits from time to time, he lives 45 minutes away and at times he does spend the night, now just in my opinion no big deal." Since I did not ask any questions in my prior response, I'm not sure why this was sent to me, but I'll leave it here in case anyone else considers it to be relevant information.
  7. No defense is apparent from anything in your post. Consult with a local criminal defense attorney.
  8. Google search for HUD section 8 visitor regulations. Needless to say, no one here knows the landlord's overnight guest rules. She should read her lease.
  9. Take a look at your bank's policy for disputing debit card transactions and submit a dispute.
  10. Full treatment of what? In what state and how long ago did this happen? Obviously, suing in small claims court is a possibility, but how did you make the initial payment? By check? If so, has the check cleared your bank account?
  11. Great. Please start your own thread (make sure to tag your state in your new thread). Resurrecting long dormant threads is frowned on.
  12. I disagree with the statement that the lawyer "should not be discussing the details of the case" with the OP and with the reason offered for that.
  13. If you're the person who contracted with the cemetery and the cemetery hasn't performed as agreed, then your recourse is to sue. Not having read your contract, there is no way for anyone here to opine intelligently about your likelihood of succeeding.
  14. Arrested for what? Charged with what? Why? Your son needs to press that issue. Body cam footage would unquestionably be discoverable, so there's no reason in the abstract why it can't be obtained. You can try anything you like, but you have no standing since you're not a party to the case. Yes. As phrased, I disagree with this. As you know, the attorney-client privilege is a rule of evidence that makes communications between a lawyer and client (and/or the agents of either) inadmissible. Simply "discussing the details of the case" with someone other than the client would have no impact on the privilege unless one of the details discussed was a confidential attorney-client communication. Moreover, the client's mother could, in some cases, be considered an agent of the client. More to the point: a public defender doesn't likely have the time to be discussing the case with the client's parent.
  15. To the best of my knowledge, no one from Louisiana posts here regularly, which is important because Louisiana law, unlike the law of every other state, derives from the French civil law system rather than the English common law system. Among other things, that means that Louisiana laws use a lot of terminology that is foreign to folks in other states. Section 3492 of the Louisiana Civil Code says as follows: "Delictual actions are subject to a liberative prescription of one year. This prescription commences to run from the day injury or damage is sustained. It does not run against minors or interdicts in actions involving permanent disability and brought pursuant to the Louisiana Products Liability Act or state law governing product liability actions in effect at the time of the injury or damage." I have no idea what the bolded terms mean, but I do know that "prescription" is the term that is used in Louisiana to refer to a statute of limitations. I also know that the general prescription/SOL for personal injury cases is one year from the date of the injury. There are multiple ways to interpret section 3492. One possible way is that everything after the word "interdicts" applies only to "interdicts" and does not apply to minors. If that's the case, then it means that, in any case involving an injury to a minor, the SOL doesn't start to run until the minor turns 18. I suggest that, if this is more than idle curiosity for you, you consult with a local attorney ASAP.
  16. I don't care to speculate about the merits of the case based on a few sentences of information from only one of the parties involved.
  17. You're in small claims territory. If you get to the point where you feel like you're being jerked around, file a small claims suit. Also read through your account agreement to make sure you've complied with any requirements contained in that agreement.
  18. This is neither a question nor a complete sentence. In the abstract, virtually anything is possible. Since you've been served with papers for a modification, you'll want to engage counsel to respond and oppose.
  19. How much money is at issue, an in what state did this occur?
  20. Appears to be no statute of limitations, so he needs a criminal defense attorney.
  21. Please clarify what this means. It's not as though banks have stacks of money that are labeled with people's names such that "the banker" gave "Jon" money from "John's" pile. Is there some reason to believe the bank's investigation will not result in you getting your money back?
  22. You haven't provided enough information to answer this question intelligently. Anyone can ask for anything. For such a short marriage, neither of you is likely to get spousal support.
×
×
  • Create New...