Jump to content

schmuey

Members
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I am a law school graduate who has just been appointed to the Berkeley Mental Health Commission.The City of Berkeley has adopted a practice ( and perhaps a tacit policy) of placing homeless persons on involuntary psychiatric holds who DO NOT MEET the health and welfare "51/50" criteria but who are instituionalized under a misapplication of the " failure to self care" test. Inability to "take care of self" is being randomly applied to homeless persons on the basis of ther status as homeless. Additonally, profiling citizens known to the coummity mental health facility or to the police as a "psychiatric patient" is common place. I am also concerned with the profiling of "mental health patients" when it takes the form of improper application of the Health and Welfare and Institutions Code in the involuntary instituionalization of "mental health patients" who commit or are accused of committing illegal or tortious acts WHERE NO NEXUS CAN BE SHOWN between the mental illness and the conduct in question. My questions are as follows: 1) Are you aware of any class action law suits regarding the misapplication of health and welfare and institutions code..either on the basis of homeless persons mischaracterized as per se "mentally ill"? or on the basis of profiling where status as a "mental health patient" is sufficient coupled with any conduct or cognition deemed problematic to justify a psychiatric hold? 2) Where should I look for cases..and for guidelines for appropriate guidelines of applicable guidelines?
×
×
  • Create New...