Jump to content

GoBigOrGoHome

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About GoBigOrGoHome

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

296 profile views
  1. Yes retiredinVA yeah that's what I wanted to hear. Thank y'all
  2. Well I don't but I dont understand the fact of how you can say that there is no law saying that he cannot change testimony when in fact you are sworn in whenever you're giving testimony to the adjudicator. So before you can even speak to give them your name you are placed upon oh over the phone then you can say your name an begin the process. And that being said every time when that changes how can that be legal that's like going to court taking charges out on someone go for the court date and the plaintiff at that point States something different then the original statements given to issue a charge and if they're different than what he filed then I believe the court would not uphold that you can't claim and fight for one thing dim when it's time to go in front of someone to handle it in the decide like a court you cannot change up your stories
  3. Yeah but what if the transcripts from the court reporter is incorrect? Their was an is multiple things that are in my transcript that never even took place in the trial or even in the courtroom there including people that was not there that actually has comments and testimony saying that it was from a specific person when that person wouldn't even in the court room meaning the DEA his cell they had a different DNA in there and in my transcripts one example are indicating that the main DEA the head DA was there in speaking when in fact he never was in court house much less speaking an it wasent even him their it was the ADA. So that just being one thing the dates that case numbers in all everything was incorrect is there room for error for that I would think not but why would a transcript that is the holy Grail incorrectly placed to paper an uses an if it has wrong info on it well it could an did damages to me . So how or who do I report to or is their even anything I can do to this matter at hand.
  4. LegalwriterOne, This is about I had a trial I was found quilty an convicted an sentenced. After I got out of prison I happen to notice that online I see my appeal an all online an then month or so later I notice that law schools an also lawyers alot of them are using my case to teach the up coming lawyers in America because emy case is now a case law . So I happen to see that alot of these law firms an university schools have the information incorrect on their sites an I was woundering if any info that is incorrectly online is unlawful or lawfully .?because it has kept me from 2 jobs . An also in my transcripts their is wrong people that the court reporter has placed in them that the people that was an never was in the court house Muchless speaking an it clearly showed they were as well as dates that are incorrect . Like case numbers an all an the charges as well . So what an is that the way that is allowed .? An if not who do I report it to ? To have the court reporter in trouble for doing wrong an incorrect work that if I need to use that for appeal it would clearly hurt me in a overturn ? An is their an statue of limitations on this matter ?
  5. RetiredinVA, I agree with you but I don't know how court gets run in your county of state that you live in in Virginia since y'all are commonwealth y'all may do things differently being in the small little good old boystown thing they have up at the courthouse goes like this the ADA dismisses at least 50 cases before the judge even comes in and sits down at the bench no judge in courtroom and the DA's dismissed several cases of district Court that happens every day also they do not do things by the book up there including the lawyers which I've also noticed regardless of what county you're in will not do hardly anything for a client paid or public defender it just makes the matter of what little bit of work they're going to imply to try to help you out they're not going to do no more than what they got to a lawyer I found out is more the less The worst criminal if us all well include the DA of which has immunity which is a crack joke anyways. Back to the point of the matter, why would the state even go as far as superseding an indictment and cost in the county more money if they know by chance that it is in fact not a controlled substance of which they indicated it was or that their wasn't enough to test why would they not at that point dismiss and why would my lawyer be telling me that they would move to take a lesser charge if in fact it was not purse a scheduled narcotic I think that is a sucker way I'm still having the defendant being charged guilty of a crime of which what's incorrectly enforced of which it's a waste of taxpayers money as well as the defendants time and loss of work and why would a state charge for people in a car the same crime as to one bag of dope when nobody spoke up to ownership of it why does the state get for individual convictions when it should only be one that should end up with the charge that's like saying the state implies charges for people that wasn't involved or that it didn't belong to the police's job to investigate and find out who's belongings it is not the defendants to snitch or tell it on someone to help the state incriminate .
  6. The problem I got is that this is a small little back hole County and they sorts do what they want to I believe they sent it off to state lab but lawyers saying if the state don't have the real drug results to prove the charge them they will reduce the felony to a misdemeanor the power to charge. But my thinking is if they're charging him with a felony then why would they even think about dropping the charge to a lesser charge because they're right no evidence maybe but the other main factor is that's where I think it should be thrown completely out of court at that point lack of evidence. Am I correct or not because the lawyer saying that he needs to take the lesser charge. I say bullcrap. Any insights can help and what happens if my lawyer does not want to do the correct thing and ask for dismissal ? And also what happens when my lawyer don't want to do what I'm telling him to do when it comes to evidence like the drugs not being real or not enough to test what does a client do? Reporting someone to the bar for that is not even the hand slap
  7. If someone's pulled over in the state of North Carolina and the cop happens to notice that there may be a possibility that drugs in the car and has two drivers step out and happens to find a piece of paper folded up in the car in the console center front of which the car belongs to the driver and the passenger is getting a ride home both get charged for schedule 1 schedule 2 and the piece of paper that was folded up in the console was not heroin as what the officer says that it is and when tested on the road side that turn blue the driver says that the substance in the paper was a crushed up stacker 2 pills so at that point if the roadside was done and they had no more powder substance to test to send off to the state lab does it warrant dismissal of charge or does the roadside indicate enough evidence for it to hold up in court for the courts to convict the driver . An if they offer an reduced charge because of the lack of the main charge because no real evidence the powder to make the schedule drugs stick? Or dismiss charge ?
  8. The county I live in has always had the behind the glad visit an now they have went to the homewayz video system an they say no personal person visit no more has to be video chat an way I see it after setting up an account you have to pay for the video visit . Well isn't that against human rights for an inmate an all? Why should one have to pay 12 bucks for a 20 min call an you have to have all the technical equipment as well as in tablet ,smartphone , an wifi. What happens if one does not have WiFi much less the device to use it I have a grandparent alive that does not even know how to even turn on a cell phone much less wifi . So is their any state of federal or human rights law being broken here in NC?
  9. Can I also receive a criminal background check on someone that lived in Florida if I live in North Carolina?
  10. How does one go about getting a background check on an attorney that you are thinking of hiring? And what if they had an expunged would there be any way to find out any information on that even if it was in a different state ?
  11. Whenever you are having an official hearing you get sworn in which means the testimony you are about to give is correct in his accurate is the best of your memory it cannot switch from time to time so whatever benefits the employer so basically what you're trying to say CBG is that you really don't have a clue cuz you keep on running in circles on things that for one sworn statement bud,and it's just like being in record of court because you're dealing with a judge on the telephone not just a regular average Joe so therefore CBG I prefer if you comment on what I'm asking that you give correct information because there's no way under the sun that a person can change testimony that's called perjury especially when you've been sworn in and also handwritten statements that are all different reasons from the original bottom line is if you don't have the correct answer why comment on
  12. Back in 2016 I have a trial for a DWI habitual and I got sentenced went and done my time came home and now I happened to notice online they have my name States 4 case law about my trial on some areas of it my question is what is the information they're using for case law is incorrect like it never happened like that in my trial so they're making it out like it did what can I do to either a have the information changed or to have it removed. And how do they end up getting the information for case law transcripts and if so that means my transcripts would be wrong then what and what is my transcript say one thing but case law is saying something different thank you for any kind of information or imput
  13. I received a speeding ticket coming through a little spot in my community by my local not-so-friendly North Carolina highway patrol of which when he approached my vehicle he had a big lip full of dip in and as he approached the vehicle I also had my phone video recording of which I have him dipping standing at my window . being that I can't smoke anywhere in a public restaurant or facility and especially government facilities how come my local highway patrolman can you dip while on the clock talkin too and also talking to the civilians and the community.? I mean it wouldn't be very nice for me to have been smoking right there in his face much less him on the clock it's all of our tax dollars paying him to be able to use products that are prohibited throughout the public facilities in places concluding parks and all so why would he be able to dip and if it is not permissible then what can a civilian do to make sure it gets address to the local highway patrolman?
×
×
  • Create New...