Jump to content

MiddlePart

Members
  • Content Count

    269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

MiddlePart last won the day on April 21

MiddlePart had the most liked content!

About MiddlePart

  • Rank
    Bronze Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Since you didn't indicate which state this building is located in, I can only offer some general comments. The landlord may have some obligations under the law in your state to do repairs on major building systems which could, in a multi-story building, include an existing elevator. The landlord may also have some obligations under the terms of your lease to do those kinds of repairs (check the terms of your lease to see what obligations the landlord expressly undertakes in that regard). ADA requirements might also impose an obligation on your landlord, but it will depend in part on the size (height, square footage) and age of the building, and some other factors. You should at least start with a written request to have the elevator repaired and see what the landlord's response is. You should also consider consulting with a lawyer in your area who can advise you on the landlord's statutory obligations, and who can examine the details to determine whether you may have a good ADA claim. If the landlord doesn't repair the elevator in response to your written request, you might have to bring a legal action against the landlord to achieve the desired result.
  2. Presumably you can issue a payment to whoever you want to, but I'd think you're accepting unnecessary and avoidable risk by sending the payment to anyone other than the deceased patient at the last address you have for him/her. if there is a will, then the will should, generally, define who is entitled to those funds, which might not be the spouse or family member that you're aware of. if there is no will, then the intestacy rules of the relevant state define who is entitled to the property of the deceased and, again, depending on the particular circumstances, the spouse or family member that you're aware of might not be the right recipient. And whether or not there's a will, there may be creditors of the deceased who are entitled to be paid before the deceased's funds get distributed to anyone. The point being that in all those circumstances, you might end up having to pay the amount twice -- once to the spouse/family member that you decided to send it to, and once to someone else who really was entitled to it under the circumstances.
  3. Depending on how you have access to his email account, it may be unlawful under federal law for you to read his emails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
  4. You could consult with a lawyer who handles those kinds of matters. On the facts you've presented, you possibly may have a good claim, but there may be additional facts or circumstances that could lead to a different conclusion. A lawyer in your area who handles those kinds of matters on a regular basis would be best able to advise you. the 'Find a Lawyer' link at the top of the page is one way for you to find a suitable lawyer
  5. If he has been sued, then the court papers should include sufficient information to explain the debt. If he has merely received a demand letter, then you (or a Kansas lawyer working on your behalf) should do some research before responding. The court records from the original case will indicate whether the judge awarded costs in favor of the school district. If costs were awarded back then, they generally becomes an obligation of the juvenile once he/she reaches 18 unless someone else pays it first.
  6. You can't prevent someone from filing suit against you. However, if the facts turn out to be as you describe (i.e., that she is suing you for misappropriating things that you provably did not misappropriate or that you sold with permission of the owner -- your mother), then the court should find in your favor. You will have to attend the hearing and present your evidence. Some phones allow you to block text messages from particular senders. Check whether your phone offers that capability.
  7. A birth certificate is not an asset that would be included in the schedule of assets and liabilities that one files in a personal bankruptcy proceeding. Have no idea what you are referring to when you say there is a "cuspid number" appointed to you. RetiredinVA speculates that you might be referring to a 'CUSIP' number but even that doesn't make sense either -- CUSIP numbers are identification codes assigned to stocks, bonds, and some other investments and are mainly used in connection with computerized trading record-keeping systems to facilitate trades of the investments and for other related activities. CUSIP numbers are not assigned to people. I'm really hoping that anyone reading this thread will recognize that RetiredinVA is attempting to be humorous. Emphasis on attempting...
  8. I think more relevant Supreme Court case would be: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). or maybe, for California-based matters: Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Co., Inc. 35 Cal. 4th 1159 (2005)
  9. the DC law on security deposits is here: https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/42/ in section 42-3502.17 also 42-3503.05 and 42-3502.22 also here: https://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Common/DCMR/RuleList.aspx?ChapterNum=14-3&ChapterId=2251 (14-308 through 14-310) It looks like as long as the 'Apartment Preparation Fee' was adequately disclosed (and you indicate it was expressly disclosed in the lease and, presumably, with the documentation accompanying payment of the remainder of the security deposit) it is probably OK for the landlord to collect it. There doesn't seem to be anything in the statutes or regs that prohibits it.
  10. What does this have to do with the OP's question? There's nothing in his original post or anywhere else in the thread to indicate that the OP has commenced litigation or is currently considering any kind of settlement from his former employer.
  11. If you feel your medical records are not accurate, you have a right to request that the doctor correct them. 45 CFR 164.526. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/164.526 The regulations include: --a procedure for requesting a change, --the time periods for a health care provider to respond to a request, --what health care providers are supposed to do if they agree with the request, --the bases upon which a health care provider can deny a request for a change, and --the procedural requirements for a denial.
  12. the Arizona law on dealer plates and when they can and can't be used may be found here: https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/28/04532.htm You can read the statute yourself for guidance, but in general it looks like an Arizona dealer plate can only be used in some limited circumstances. Your post was a little confusing (at least to me) on what exactly is going on, so I don't know whether your situation fits within the limited circumstances in which it is OK to use an Arizona dealer plate or whether something sketchy is happening.
  13. I do view it as a covenant not to compete. It is an agreement that the doctor will not provide services to 'customers' (patients) of the medical practice that the doctor used to be associated with. And so at a minimum it would need to be evaluated against the requirements of section 15.50. But as I said above, one would have to look at all of the relevant language in the contract to evaluate its enforceability.
  14. One would have to look at all of the relevant language in the contract to be able to reach a conclusion. However, such covenants can be enforceable in Texas if they meet all of the relevant statutory requirements. As follows (the most important parts I put in boldface): Texas Business & Commerce Code, Title 2, Chapter 15 Sec. 15.50. CRITERIA FOR ENFORCEABILITY OF COVENANTS NOT TO COMPETE. (a) Notwithstanding Section 15.05 of this code, and subject to any applicable provision of Subsection (b), a covenant not to compete is enforceable if it is ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement at the time the agreement is made to the extent that it contains limitations as to time, geographical area, and scope of activity to be restrained that are reasonable and do not impose a greater restraint than is necessary to protect the goodwill or other business interest of the promisee. (b) A covenant not to compete relating to the practice of medicine is enforceable against a person licensed as a physician by the Texas Medical Board if such covenant complies with the following requirements: (1) the covenant must: (A) not deny the physician access to a list of his patients whom he had seen or treated within one year of termination of the contract or employment; (B) provide access to medical records of the physician's patients upon authorization of the patient and any copies of medical records for a reasonable fee as established by the Texas Medical Board under Section 159.008, Occupations Code; and (C) provide that any access to a list of patients or to patients' medical records after termination of the contract or employment shall not require such list or records to be provided in a format different than that by which such records are maintained except by mutual consent of the parties to the contract; (2) the covenant must provide for a buy out of the covenant by the physician at a reasonable price or, at the option of either party, as determined by a mutually agreed upon arbitrator or, in the case of an inability to agree, an arbitrator of the court whose decision shall be binding on the parties; and (3) the covenant must provide that the physician will not be prohibited from providing continuing care and treatment to a specific patient or patients during the course of an acute illness even after the contract or employment has been terminated. (c) Subsection (b) does not apply to a physician's business ownership interest in a licensed hospital or licensed ambulatory surgical center.
  15. Under federal law, it is generally OK to take those things into account in making a hiring decision. Those categories are not among the categories that federal discrimination law protects. Although you'd want to be careful that discriminating against candidates who apply from dissimilar climates/regions doesn't cross the line into national origin discrimination, which is unlawful at the federal level.
×
×
  • Create New...