Jump to content

kidnappedinusa

Members
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About kidnappedinusa

  • Rank
    New Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW Petitioner, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to International Treaty and 42 U.S.C. § 11601 et seq., submits this supplemental memorandum of law in support of his Verified Petition for Return of Child Pursuant to International Treaty and Federal Statute. A. The Country of Habitual Residence Cannot be a Country where the Child is Wrongfully Retained or where the Parent and Child have no Legal Immigration Status. 2.) Memorandum of Law filed by Petitioner-SANITIZED.pdf
  2. Is there any lawyer out there who KNOWS and UNDERSTANDS these laws below? Any Lawyer who agrees that JUDGES act as CRIMINALS (TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW) if they violate Federal Laws, The American Constitution and International Treaties? If you are a lawyer who is NOT part of the "criminal enterprise" and would like to help 200,000 kidnapped children each year, then I would like to hear from you. My child was born in Marbella, Spain. Is a German Citizen by birth right and came into the USA with me (German Father) and my wife (Filipina Mother) on an E-2 Investors Visa as "Dependent Spouse" and "Dependent Child". My wife is ILLEGAL in the USA and REFUSED to return to Spain, our legal domicile, and WRONGFULLY RETAINED my child in USA. I filed a The Hague Petition 4 months after the wrongful retention and a corrupt judge ruled that my son is "Well settled" which is a plain violation of Federal Immigration laws, due to the fact that my son is ILLEGAL IN THE USA. See attachments. Memorandum of Law, + When an Oath becomes a Crime + Summary Proceedings Null & Void. If you are a SMART LAWYER who can FIGHT THIS CORRUPT SYSTEM, with the help of the new President Mr. Trump, then you are my guy.... If you dont understand these EXISTING SUPREME COURT rulings and laws, dont even bother to respond.... CIRCUIT COURT A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997). Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges. The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody and control of Judge G.. The Circuit Court of Cook County remains a criminal enterprise. TREASON Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) Any judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprision of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382. Judges across the Nation are in Violation of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act 8 USC§ 1324(a) (1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii) and are guilty of conspiracy of harboring illegal aliens and Violation of Color of Law Abuse, Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241, Conspiracy Against Rights and Violation of Color of Law Abuse Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law This kind of criminal and corrupt behavior is undisputed evidence that these Judges are TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW. These corrupt judges have committed the following criminal offenses: (1) conspiracy to transport illegal aliens, harbor illegal aliens including a minor foreign children and induce illegal aliens to reside in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) and 1324(a)(1)(B)(i) and (2) failing to depart the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a)(1)(A). S (Just look at the Sanctuary Cities across the Nation and the Political Corruption to IGNORE Federal Immigration Laws by these corrupt City Leaders!) I am certain that you are aware of these Federal Laws: "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both." Across the Nation, corrupt Judges are acting as TRESPASSERS OF FEDERAL LAWS by allowing and enabling ILLEGAL ALIENS who have kidnapped their own children into USA, to further stay ILLEGALLY in the USA! By allowing these illegal aliens to further kidnap, conceal and wrongfully retain these children in the USA without the other parents’ consent and without their permission, these corrupt Judges commit criminal acts and violate their own Oath to honor the American Constitution. Judges who act as TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW, and the thousands of Lawyers who “defend” these ILLEGAL ALIEN CHILD KIDNAPPERS, should be immediately removed from the bench / BAR Association and thrown into jail for running a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE under the RICO Act. Wrongfully retaining these kidnapped children against their own will and against the will of the left behind parents ILLEGALLY in the U.S., without any legal residence status whatsoever, without any health insurance and without any legal resident status of the kidnapping parent is a breach of left behind parents’ custody rights and their rights to determine the place of residence under the Hague Convention as clearly defined under and pursuant Article 3 and Article 5 of said Act. It is also a FEDERAL CRIME to conspire with the ILLEGAL ALIEN child kidnapper and it is a FEDERAL CRIME to harbor Illegal Aliens! TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870) Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828) The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law, and are engaged in treason (see below). The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Florida, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original]. By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE For example: In Florida "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form: 'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Florida, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'" In Florida, a judge must take a second oath of office, which states that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State: 'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Florida, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'" Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...". The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No State legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. THE JUDGE IS ENGAGED IN ACTS OF TREASON. Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Florida, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below). If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason. TREASON Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) Any judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprision of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382 Responses to denials were Motions to reinstate using the Constitutional Articles as a major Guide, along with the Judges Oath of Office, and CANONS of Judicial Code of Conduct. The responses also included page after page of case law where both appellate courts and the Supreme Court did hold judges accountable when their knowing and willing actions fell outside the boundaries of their job description. That failure to follow simple guidelines of their post makes a judge's action no longer a Judicial act but an Individual act as the act represents their own prejudices and goals. Case Law also states that when a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, he then loses subject matter jurisdiction and the Judges orders are void, of no legal force or affect. 5.) Summary proceedings null and void.pdf 6.) When an Oath becomes a Crime.pdf
  3. I NEED A LAW FIRM WHO CAN GET IN FRONT OF MR. TRUMP TO PRESENT MY CHILD KIDNAPPING CASE. Open Letter to Mr. Donald J. Trump regarding CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY - Taxpayer-Funded Human Trafficking, Harboring of Illegal Aliens & Child Kidnapping under the RICO ACT JUDGES ABOVE FEDERAL LAWS? CONSPIRING IN CHILD KIDNAPPING & HARBORING OF ILLEGAL ALIENS! Violation of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act 8 USC § 1324(a) (1)(a)(iv)(b)(iii) 200,000 Children every year Kidnapped or wrongfully retained into USA by Illegal Immigrants and supported by criminal Judges who VIOLATE their Oath and VIOLATE the American Constitution! "All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void" Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180 I am victim of a child kidnapping case by an ILLEGAL ALIEN who has been protected by corrupt judges. I need a smart and open minded (REPUBLICAN LAWYER) to help present my case to Mr. Donald Trump to finally get JUSTICE. My wife J**** A***** is ILLEGAL in the USA. As you know, Mr. Trump will arrest all ILLEGAL ALIENS, especially those who overstayed their visas. My wife is one of them. I wrote hard copy letters to Mr. Trumps office. Please let me know if you can help me and get this case in front of Mr. Trump. There are 200,000 children being kidnapped into USA by ILLEGAL ALIENS and they are protected by the corrupt Obama administration. I want my child back.
×
×
  • Create New...