Jump to content

doesdadhaverights

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About doesdadhaverights

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Requesting a report is 'far from appropriate'???? WHAT???? What law and statute is this based off of??? REALLY?????
  2. What law is this stuff based off of? My understanding is that this is a LEGAL FORUM, which would suggest that actual black letter law is discussed, which has TWO sides, and is not conclusory. There must be defenses. There are basic fundamental rights to United States citizens. Please dsicuss BOTH SIDES, not just your opinions, and back up what you have to say with LAW. Is it legal to pass laws against classes of persons? In this instance it would seem that laws are being passed against the class of NCP's. It would seem there is some legal remedy here in a nation where ALL citizens have basic Constitutional RIghts. The answers I receive on this forum seem as if there are absolutely no rights to a NCP, even when the NCP has been found to have Joint Legal Custody. Can a principle just go out and start shooting children at the school because they feel it is appropriate? By the answers I have been receiving on here it would follow that this is the case. If not, then at what legal point does the principles 'privilege' end and become over stepping the bounds? I am seeking the basis of law here. There has to be law governing these matters. CPS works on quotas and is politically based, family courts work on political corruption. Surely anyone on here that is an attorney took Political Science at the very least, and have surely seen in actual dealings in the courts that this is so. Tactics such as asking the D 'so are you saying ti is my fault? Whose fault is it' is such a commonly used tactic in the family courts that it is blatantly obvious what I am saying it true. And the people running the courts laugh and call it such things like 'Jerry Springer Day', and make attacking children entertainment. Lego sticks ( the sticks, not the blocks) are hollow tubes, They can absolutely cause a puncture wound if used in a stabbing motion. The family court would just assign some guardian ad litem to affix a $15,000.00 or higher debt on me and throw me in jail for contempt of court for being unable to pay the extortion fees, and would not look at any interest in the child. It has to come from the school, but they are just as corrupt.
  3. As I have mentioned previously my child had a social services crisis intervention last Christmas due to behavioral issues. I tried to describe how the mother, aunt and grandmother were using him essentially as a weapon, as well as other children physically attack him and the adults just allow it to happen, and then the school officials leave bruises on him and just ignore the abuse situation he is in, and actually add to it and take part in it. I referred to photos of my son, posted on fb by his mother, of him dressed up for a gay parade 5k run as an example of how the mother, aunt and grandmother are attempting to deliberately use the child as a weapon to harm me, and in turn are harming him. It is somewhat referred to in the police report from last Christmas, albeit skewed by the officer's manipulation and selective listening. However, that very night my son's mother went and dressed him up and put women's lipstick on him and posted a photo og him like that on fb, as well as a photo of him extending his middle finger back when he was around the age of three, and her, her mother and her sister were all making comments in the comment section which appear aimed at causing me emotional distress, perhaps in trying to get a reaction out of me. My understanding is that she took him camping with a transvestite, takes him to a restaurant with flamboyant waiters in order to deliberately influence him, simply to try to distance the child from me. I personally do not care if my child chooses to live whatever lifestyle he WANTS but my issue is with him being used as a weapon. Is this enough evidence, along with the fact that her attorney initially made fun of a physicians referral in court when my son was one that he be seen by a developmental specialist for probable autism, which was ignored by the mother until two years later when a day care provider gave her a written referral that she was legally obligated to act under after ignoring verbal referral from the day care provider; as well as the child has been literally taken out of the classroom since Christmas from the other children. I live 1000 miles away, largely due to the hostility from the mother. The actual facts are the complete opposite of the stereotype. She is the abusive party, yet nobody will entertain reality due to it conflicts with their desired beliefs and sticking with the status quo. Is there truly no remedy for the child in this situation other than that he must suffer abuse because society just says it is ok? The police officer literally refused to investigate a puncture wound on the child that the child claimed came from his teachers aid stabbing him with a lego stick, claiming it is a conflict of interest against his job to protect the administration last year. I made complaints to the school staff and social worker about the abuse and they ran out and called the police on me. This is absolutely really occurring.
  4. Police report reads principal calls about 'agitated parent' during crisis intervention with social services. Nothing further describing what actions accused made to define 'agitated parent'. Police report ends that matter is resolved and closed, but that Principal requests officer be posted at child pick up. Principal begins making horrified faces and behaving like a child as non-custodial drives up to pick up child, but child is placed in car and non-custodial and child leave school without further incident. Non-custodial gets police report 8 months later noting that it reads principal wants police officer posted at school during pick up, even thought police report states that matter is closed. Non-custodial has not returned to school since Christmas to allow emotions to settle. Non-custodial contacts school board secretary to get guidance as to if it is ok to pick up and drop off child on visitation, noting that there is a court order which specifically reads 'visitation shall not be interfered with while child is in school, and requests how to obtain any reports on incident'. No response from secretary of school board for over a week. Non-custodial sees link to facebook page from school board site and posts questions again, seeking if ok to pick up and drop off child at school and how to obtain reports as to what accusation are causing concern with principal. Non-custodial receives phone call from police department that he can continue picking up and dropping off child upon visitation, but any contact with school board will be considered harassment. Questions: Does non-custodial have right to access reports by principal and school staff made to the school board? Does school board have a right to ignore requests of such information? Can police legally threaten criminal proceeding on a non-custodial parent for requesting information concerning themselves from the school board? Is there a section in the Connecticut Digest that would address laws on privileges or overstepping privileges against a non-custodial invitee to Social Services intervention? Can Principal unilaterally bar non-custodial from school grounds indefinitely when there is a court order stating that visitation shall not be interfered with while child is in school for no reason other than she is offended by such a trivial matter as the ex doesn't like the child's father because she and the child's mother are friends? If so what section would I search, or what case law takes precedent on such matters? Please forego conclusory hostile attacks based off of stereotypes, or at least argue BOTH SIDES of legal argument. Also, I am not seeking to find remedy. I am a FYLS and am actually blown away at this, but would like to know what Statutes allow a parent to be treated like this, as well as have to go see child while mother is in surgery, and wish to know what I am legally talking about if I am attacked again.
  5. For clarities sake I have not written anything about anyone in this forum. And to anyone having issues with my posts, which are just my personal opinions, please refrain from reading or responding to my posts.
  6. So if people do not discuss case law, or even common law in a legal forum, should this be called find political opinion forums? I would expect issues to be addressed here as they would on a Bar Exam or at least a mid-term examination, as opposed to tantrums and name calling. This is exactly why I am seeking case law on this forum. I suppose that I should have expected nothing less of persons who prey upon children for a living.
  7. I cannot seem to find the post I placed here asking about Tort laws v. school and school boards. I am seeking direction on black letter law and case law on the matters, not people's emotions and personal opinions. Just emotionally claiming that because a person has a child that it makes all interaction with a school family matters clearly does not have legal standing. School officials can not abuse children, and that is not a family law matter. Can anyone provide me with case law on the course of action required on the part of a school official and of what is required of a state social worker when a verbal report is made of concerns of child abuse in the State of Connecticut? Also, is there recourse for a non-custodial parent through Tort law when the school retaliates against a non-custodial parent for making a compliant of abuse on the child, by the school calling the police to have the non-custodial parent removed by the police out of malicious action? Please only respond with case law and black letter law, instead of childish insults and emotional tantrums? Are we simply saying bigotry and genocide are ok as long as we call it something else? Really? Just because family attorneys get away with making up outlandish stories against fathers in family courts does not negate that some mothers actually harm their children intentionally in real life. There must be law that handles when people hide such action and take part of it. There must also be law concerning school officials who break laws. Just being offended when someone says something is occurring and claiming it did not happen does not make it so.
  8. FACTS: (issues list below fact pattern; real life situation, not test fact pattern) Non-custodial parent visiting from out of state to elementary age child diagnosed with autism for Christmas break. Receives phone call from Principal demanding appearance at State Social Worker crisis intervention taking place at school. Ex-wife and her sister are present, along with Principal, School Psychologist, State Social Worker, and Teachers Aid. School alleging child is violent, needs physical restraints on nearly daily basis, and seeking to remove child from normal class-room for remainder of year. Non-custodial parent with joint legal custody states that because earned an Associate’s Degree in Psychology among his academic achievements, that he believes there are some basic principal’s that seem to be getting overlooked in dealing with the child, whom he does not have to lay hands on. Non-custodial brings up fact that child currently has bruises on body that child claims came from isolation restraints from teacher's aide. Non-custodial brings up he believes child is presenting from psychosis from being in a dysfunctional home where mother, her sister and their mother use child as a weapon and are mentally abusive towards child and that mother is a demonstrated sociopath (also performing Munchausen Syndrome-by-proxy on child with aid of her mother and sister) and that psychologist are ignoring glaring scientific procedures and presentations in place of political beliefs of women's rights. All present other than non-custodial are females offended by non-custodial's concerns that child is presenting from abuse and does not need activists with psychologist licenses ignoring psychology training to ask child how he feels about being abused for being born male, and that this child needs his father. Non-custodial was cursed at by mother and ridiculed by child's aunt for stating that if the psychologists used science based principals they would clearly see presentations of abuse rather than using what is called the 'feminist lens' where male child is automatically targeted as aggressor. Principal and school psychologist went and called police. Mother yells 'Please don't leave me in a room alone with him!' Non-custodial quickly stands up and walks out of room and sits on bench in sign in area of school, assuming he is waiting for police to arrive. School Safety Officers arrive and ask Non-custodial to come outside to talk. Police report states that non-custodial was sitting calmly when they arrived and that non-custodial complied with request to come outside. Non-custodial explained how mother and her family have been posting photos of child at gay pride parade, dressed up as gay person in order to use child recently as a weapon. Police report states father mentioned child having homosexual ideals forced upon him. Police report reads mother interviewed by other officer states she has no concerns of child being endangered through visitations with father. Then officers ask to do pat down for weapons as they state Officer clears non-custodial to continue picking up and dropping off son for elementary school. Principal requests officer posted at school that evening for pick up when children where let out for school. Principal begins staring at non-custodial with horrified look on her face, humiliating non-custodial parent as he drives up to pick up young minor child, apparently endangering child's welfare by attempting to get officer to confront non-custodial parent, and para-professional for handicapped child sees this and hurriedly gets child into the car. Non-custodial parent has no incidents the following day, but does not return the rest of that school year. Visits child during summer when child is out of school partially to diffuse situation to help ease any aggression against child as non-custodial fears child will be targeted. Non-custodial obtains police report six months after it is filed but does not understand what statute or law he violated by stating that he believes child is in abusive home and essentially being beaten and ostracized by school staff for being a mentally abused child. Non-custodial emails School Board Secretary requesting guidance as to if he is ok to continue picking up child and dropping off child from school per court visitation orders throughout coming year on visits, as well as requests how to obtain any reports as to why police intervention was necessary. Email was ignored, so about a week later, non-custodial posted same request on Secretary of School Board's Facebook account along with questions on legality of calling police on non-custodial parent for stating abuse concerns. Non-custodial gets phone call from police stating that further contact to school board secretary would be deemed as harassment. Non-custodial perplexed and in fear of long term mental disturbance to child. Non-custodial also has constant severe emotional distress over the incidents of being publicly humiliated, deprived of relationship, possibly slandered, intimidated by threats of force, intimidated through actions of abuse towards minor child, denied rights to aid for child and punished by use of force and threat of force by actions. Also question of compensation of eminent domain as if it is in society's interest or interest of the state that the autistic child be segregated, is he not owed compensation, and is non-custodial parents rights being taken away by 'privilege' a matter of eminent domain where non-custodial should be compensated for loss of chattel in relation to child? Any recourse or remedy; preferably through Federal Court as father resides in state of Georgia and school and school board are in Connecticut and it is a financial burden on P to pursue matter in Connecticut and P believes will not be able to obtain fair trial or even hearings on the matter due to bias against males in Connecticut due to Sandy Hook hysteria making views against class of people (male fathers at schools) being the main issue. Any remedies for child or non-custodial parent? ISSUES: (possible list of areas of interest) Can a male be targeted for simply being a male at a school parent teacher meeting or state crisis intervention at the school where the Principal just makes apparent retaliatory claims privilege on decision making in exposing male to being made out to be threatening for bringing up opposing concerns of abuse on minor child. If Federal Courts have jurisdiction over this as an interstate matter, can non-custodial (P) file in Georgia where P resides as opposed to Connecticut where school and child reside, as P believes he will not be able to obtain fair hearing or trial in Connecticut due to bias against non- New Englanders and hysteria against males at schools (class of people) in Connecticut, and there is undue financial burden on P to pursue this matter in Connecticut? P does not understand what statute or law he violated by stating that he believes child is in abusive home and essentially being beaten and ostracized by school staff for being a mentally abused child. P also does not understand how asking for clarification or guidance by school board on matter along with any in -house reports on matter is harassment. If it is in society's interest or interest of the state that the autistic child be segregated, is he not owed compensation, and is non-custodial parents rights being taken away by 'privilege' a matter of eminent domain where non-custodial should be compensated for loss of chattel in relation to child? School and state social worker (whom school called) have ignored verbal reports made by visiting non-custodial parent concerned of physical (with current bruises at time of report) and mental abuse on 8 year old high functioning autistic child when reports where being made during 'crisis intervention' by State Social Worker. Crisis Intervention appears planned in order to have excuse to remove child from all classes for the rest of the year, and Principal and staff seem offended when non-custodial begins quoting basics of developmental psychology and sociology to Social Worker. Police called on visiting out of state non-custodial parent for calmly voicing concerns of abuse, when Principal demanded his attendance at social worker intervention. Officers request to perform body pat-down on non-custodial to search for weapons, stating 'someone mentioned possibility of a weapon' as non-custodial was reported to have kept placing his hand inside pockets of jacket during social worker intervention. Non-custodial complied with pat down. Random woman walks up asking officers 'is everything alright?' on her way into the school. Officer clears non-custodial parent to continue picking up and dropping off child at school as per court ordered visitation order. Principal demands officer be posted at school pick up line that evening even though no mention of threats or fear in police report; whereas police report says issue closed and police report says mother not in fear of father being with child. Principal making extreme gestures of horrified looks aimed at non-custodial parent in front of other parents parked in line to pick up child while Principal is standing across driveway from posted police officer. (child quickly placed in car by para-professional to diffuse situation) Parent and child drive off without further incident. Non-custodial feels immense mental distress over situation yet feels helpless to get intervention for child in any way Six months later non-custodial visits and obtains police report where he has to be physically present to obtain police report. Non-custodial emails School Board Secretary about concerns after obtaining police report for guidance on upcoming new school year to see if they have issue with further visitation of pick up and drop offs that year, and how to obtain reports made on the issue to find out why Principal said she called police; request for information and/or feedback ignored. One week later, non-custodial Facebook posts on School Board Official's Facebook page listed on School Board website, stating that request for information was ignored and that he had concerns of child being physically and mentally abused by school for being in a mentally abusive home. Non-custodial parent then receives phone call from police department stating no crime as of yet, but further contact to school board official will be crime of harassment. Non-custodial still dealing with severe emotional distress. Child removed from all classes and placed in isolated room for next 5 months of school except for some children brought in to play indoor with him for recess or lunch. Mother takes issue to school board to get re-introduction plan which started last week (8 months later) I am asking about Torts; and yes, Federal Courts do have jurisdiction in interstate tort matters. To this end I am seeking guidance as to can I file in Federal Court in Georgia on a matter that occurred interstate in the State of Connecticut as I reside in the State of Georgia. The issue which I am having with child protective services is that nobody will take any reports from me seriously due to gender bias that, well you know full well the bias against men in the family court system and child protective services. The Social Services woman that was present did absolutely nothing. Again, there are MANY tort claims here against many D's. But again, nobody will look past that it is a school principal doing it, leading, where even the police Lt says his hands are tied as it is a conflict of interest which jeopardizes his side job as a school safety officer. He refused to investigate when my child told me the teachers aid stabbed him in the hand with a lego stick after he had been questioning me about bacterial and viral infections and I asked him if he had a cut he was worrying about. They appear to be behaving like mean 11 year girls with their hands over their ears going ' I can't hear you, nah nah, nah' just like they have been moved to do through social engineering. But there must be case precedent in such matters, as this effects multitudes of children throughout the United States. It is corruption and everyone knows it. What recourse is there? Family court would just assign a Guardian Ad Litem to get me in contempt for being unable to pay extortion fees for the Ad Litem and they would ignore everything that the school and social worker and police as well as the first family court has ignored, even though now there is a paper trail of abuse. So, my recourse is only tort law.
  9. I am asking about Torts; and yes, Federal Courts do have jurisdiction in interstate tort matters. To this end I am seeking guidance as to can I file in Federal Court in Georgia on a matter that occurred interstate in the State of Connecticut as I reside in the State of Georgia. The issue which I am having with child protective services is that nobody will take any reports from me seriously due to gender bias that, well you know full well the bias against men in the family court system and child protective services. The Social Services woman that was present did absolutely nothing. Again, there are MANY tort claims here against many D's. But again, nobody will look past that it is a school principal doing it, leading, where even the police Lt says his hands are tied as it is a conflict of interest which jeopardizes his side job as a school safety officer. He refused to investigate when my child told me the teachers aid stabbed him in the hand with a lego stick after he had been questioning me about bacterial and viral infections and I asked him if he had a cut he was worrying about. Even what in my opinion appears to be a very lazy and bigoted response here shows to me the bigotry which I am up against in a society under self imposed genocide through social engineering. Because they are behaving like mean 11 year girls with their hands over their ears going ' I can't hear you, nah nah, nah' just like they have been moved to do through social engineering. But there must be case precedent in such matters, as this effects multitudes of children throughout the United States. It is corruption and everyone knows it. What recourse is there? Family court would just assign a Guardian Ad Litem to get me in contempt for being unable to pay extortion fees for the Ad Litem and they would ignore everything that the school and social worker and police as well as the first family court has ignored, even though now there is a paper trail of abuse. So, my recourse is only tort law
  10. FACTS: ( issues list below fact pattern; real life situation, not test fact pattern) Non-custodial parent visiting from out of state to elementary age child diagnosed with autism for Christmas break. Receives phone call from Principal demanding appearance at State Social Worker crisis intervention taking place at school. Ex wife and her sister are present, along with Principal, School Psychologist, State Social Worker, and Teachers Aid. School alleging child is violent, needs physical restraints on nearly daily basis, and seeking to remove child from normal class-room for remainder of year. Non-custodial parent with joint legal custody states that because earned an Associates Degree in Psychology among his academic achievements, that he believes there are some basic principals that seem to be getting overlooked in dealing with the child, whom he does not have to lay hands on. Non-custodial brings up fact that child currently has bruises on body that child claims came from isolation restraints from teacher's aid. Non-custodial brings up he believes child is presenting from psychosis from being in a dysfunctional home where mother, her sister and their mother use child as a weapon and are mentally abusive towards child and that mother is a demonstrated sociopath ( also performing Munchausen Syndrome-by-proxy on child with aid of her mother and sister) and that psychologist are ignoring glaring scientific procedures and presentations in place of political beliefs of women's rights. All present other than non-custodial are females offended by non-custodial's concerns that child is presenting from abuse and does not need activists with psychologist licenses ignoring psychology training to ask child how he feels about being abused for being born male, and that this child needs his father. Non-custodial was cursed at by mother and ridiculed by child's aunt for stating that if the psychologists used science based principals they would clearly see presentations of abuse rather than using what is called the 'feminist lens' where male child is automatically targeted as aggressor. Principal and school psychologist went and called police. Mother yells 'Please don't leave me in a room alone with him!' Non-custodial quickly stands up and walks out of room and sits on bench in sign in area of school, assuming he is waiting for police to arrive. School Safety Officers arrive and ask Non-custodial to come outside to talk. Police report states that non-custodial was sitting calmly when they arrived and that non-custodial complied with request to come outside. Non-custodial explained how mother and her family have been posting photos of child at gay pride parade, dressed up as gay person in order to use child recently as a weapon. Police report states father mentioned child having homosexual ideals forced upon him. Police report reads mother interviewed by other officer states she has no concerns of child being endangered through visitations with father. Then officers ask to do pat down for weapons as they state Officer clears non-custodial to continue picking up and dropping off son for elementary school. Principal requests officer posted at school that evening for pick up when children where let out for school. Principal begins staring at non-custodial with horrified look on her face, humiliating non-custodial parent as he drives up to pick up young minor child, apparently endangering child's welfare by attempting to get officer to confront non-custodial parent, and para-professional for handicapped child sees this and hurriedly gets child into the car. Non-custodial parent has no incidents the following day, but does not return the rest of that school year. Visits child during summer when child is out of school partially to diffuse situation to help ease any aggression against child as non-custodial fears child will be targeted. Non-custodial obtains police report six months after it is filed but does not understand what statute or law he violated by stating that he believes child is in abusive home and essentially being beaten and ostracized by school staff for being a mentally abused child. Non-custodial emails School Board Secretary requesting guidance as to if he is ok to continue picking up child and dropping off child from school per court visitation orders throughout coming year on visits, as well as requests how to obtain any reports as to why police intervention was necessary. Email was ignored, so about a week later, non-custodial posted same request on Secretary of School Board's Facebook account along with questions on legality of calling police on non-custodial parent for stating abuse concerns. Non-custodial gets phone call from police stating that further contact to school board secretary would be deemed as harassment. Non-custodial perplexed and in fear of long term mental disturbance to child. Non-custodial also has constant severe emotional distress over the incidents of being publicly humiliated, deprived of relationship, possibly slandered, intimidated by threats of force, intimidated through actions of abuse towards minor child, denied rights to aid for child and punished by use of force and threat of force by actions. Also question of compensation of eminent domain as if it is in society's interest or interest of the state that the autistic child be segregated, is he not owed compensation, and is non-custodial parents rights being taken away by 'privilege' a matter of eminent domain where non-custodial should be compensated for loss of chattel in relation to child? Any recourse or remedy; preferably through Federal Court as father resides in state of Georgia and school and school board are in Connecticut and it is a financial burden on P to pursue matter in Connecticut and P believes will not be able to obtain fair trial or even hearings on the matter due to bias against males in Connecticut due to Sandy Hook hysteria making views against class of people ( male fathers at schools) being the main issue. Any remedies for child or non-custodial parent? ISSUES: ( possible list of areas of interest) Can a male be targeted for simply being a male at a school parent teacher meeting or state crisis intervention at the school where the Principal just makes apparent retaliatory claims privilege on decision making in exposing male to being made out to be threatening for bringing up opposing concerns of abuse on minor child. If Federal Courts have jurisdiction over this as an interstate matter, can non-custodial (P) file in Georgia where P resides as opposed to Connecticut where school and child reside, as P believes he will not be able to obtain fair hearing or trial in Connecticut due to bias against non New Englanders and hysteria against males at schools (class of people) in Connecticut, and there is undue financial burden on P to pursue this matter in Connecticut? P does not understand what statute or law he violated by stating that he believes child is in abusive home and essentially being beaten and ostracized by school staff for being a mentally abused child. P also does not understand how asking for clarification or guidance by school board on matter along with any in -house reports on matter is harassment. If it is in society's interest or interest of the state that the autistic child be segregated, is he not owed compensation, and is non-custodial parents rights being taken away by 'privilege' a matter of eminent domain where non-custodial should be compensated for loss of chattel in relation to child? School and state social worker (whom school called) have ignored verbal reports made by visiting non-custodial parent concerned of physical (with current bruises at time of report) and mental abuse on 8 yr old high functioning autistic child when reports where being made during 'crisis intervention' by State Social Worker. Crisis Intervention appears planned in order to have excuse to remove child from all classes for the rest of the year, and Principal and staff seem offended when non-custodial begins quoting basics of developmental psychology and sociology to Social Worker. Police called on visiting out of state non-custodial parent for calmly voicing concerns of abuse, when Principal demanded his attendance at social worker intervention. Officers request to perform body pat-down on non-custodial to search for weapons, stating 'someone mentioned possibility of a weapon' as non-custodial was reported to have kept placing his hand inside pockets of jacket during social worker intervention. Non-custodial complied with pat down. Random woman walks up asking officers 'is everything alright?' on her way into the school. Officer clears non-custodial parent to continue picking up and dropping off child at school as per court ordered visitation order. Principal demands officer be posted at school pick up line that evening even though no mention of threats or fear in police report; whereas police report says issue closed and police report says mother not in fear of father being with child. Principal making extreme gestures of horrified looks aimed at non-custodial parent in front of other parents parked in line to pick up child while Principal is standing across driveway from posted police officer. ( child quickly placed in car by para-professional to diffuse situation) Parent and child drive off without further incident. Non-custodial feels immense mental distress over situation yet feels helpless to get intervention for child in any way Six months later non-custodial visits and obtains police report where he has to be physically present to obtain police report. Non-custodial emails School Board Secretary about concerns after obtaining police report for guidance on upcoming new school year to see if they have issue with further visitation of pick up and drop offs that year, and how to obtain reports made on the issue to find out why Principal said she called police; request for information and/or feedback ignored. One week later, non-custodial Facebook posts on School Board Official's Facebook page listed on School Board website, stating that request for information was ignored and that he had concerns of child being physically and mentally abused by school for being in a mentally abusive home. Non-custodial parent then receives phone call from police department stating no crime as of yet, but further contact to school board official will be crime of harassment. Non-custodial still dealing with severe emotional distress. Child removed from all classes and placed in isolated room for next 5 moths of school except for some children brought in to play indoor with him for recess or lunch. Mother takes issue to school board to get re-introduction plan which started last week (8 months later)
×
×
  • Create New...