Thanks, I hope to learn something here, anyone, input wil be valued.
Edited by FindLaw_AHK, 22 February 2013 - 10:01 AM.
This post has been edited to remove personal or identifying information. -Moderator
Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:38 AM
Edited by FindLaw_AHK, 22 February 2013 - 10:01 AM.
This post has been edited to remove personal or identifying information. -Moderator
Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:08 AM
Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:34 AM
Edited by FindLaw_AHK, 22 February 2013 - 10:01 AM.
This post has been edited to remove personal or identifying information. -Moderator
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:11 AM
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:40 AM
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:59 AM
Posted 22 February 2013 - 11:43 AM
Posted 22 February 2013 - 01:22 PM
I learned from *** "that that they (***) do not support theose internet services in my area.
That is all they would abmit to, but refuse to put it in writing (email).
All the Advertisments state that they indeed do so. internet services is a "Key Feature" of this model and the reason I selected it. It nowhere states "not supported in the US Virgin Islands", where a 100,000 [persons] live.
Is this a violation of my Rights? Consumer Fruad? Flase Advetising? or all of the above if so a "Class Action Suite". What can I do about this I have dozens of hours in time for an AV tech to sort this out plus a $1,000.00 receiver which won't preform as advevtised.
you're free to try and figure out how to get a court to say that they should put a sticker on the device saying "This may not work for your purposes where you live; please see X-Y-Z before you buy."
by the way there is a sticker on it stating just such claims.
I hope there are other posters out there, maybe I did pick the wrong board. In the Past I've been able to find avdice on find law, other than opionated pundits.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users