Request for Admission and Motion to Determine Sufficiency
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:16 AM
1. How do I get clarification as to whether that means ALL 16 admissions or just the 7 being challenged?
2. If it is all 16 of them including the 9 that were answered properly ...can the judge even do that?
The attorney on the other side seems to think it means all 16 are admitted which would end the case as the 9 statements went directly to the elements of the lawsuit. If it means all 16 are admitted then the case is over ...
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:02 AM
As to how you get clarificaiton, you file a Motion for Clarification.
Here's a couple of observations:
1 - That you even raised the 5th amendment in a civil case means you are in over your head and need a lawyer.
2 - Going up against a lawyer without one of your own is like bringing a rubber knife to a gunfight. You'll be the one to end up on the ground bleeding. And the other party's attorney has just drawn first blood.
Warning: Legal issues are complicated. Explanations and comments here are simplified and might not fully explain the ramifications of your particular issue. I am not a lawyer. I do not give legal advice. I make comments based on my knowledge and experience. I guarantee nothing. If you act on my comments without the advice of an attorney, you do so at your own risk.
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:03 AM
Note that in a civil case, making even a good claim to the 5th amendment privilege against self-incrimination can result in the court deeming that the answer would be adverse to you and thus could be used against you. It is not like the criminal case in which the defendant's proper claim to the privilege cannot be used against him. This is something that a lot of pro se litigants don’t seem to understand. Thus, if by making the 5th amendment claims you were hoping to avoid having those items admitted, that wasn’t likely to work. If the claims were not well supported, the judge may not take kindly to that. In my experience, unfounded claims to the 5th amendment privilege are viewed by judges as an attempt to play games with the system. The result of that can be a sanction of some sort, like deeming ALL the requests for admissions as admitted by you. The extent to which the court may do that depends on the court rules for the jurisidiction in which this is being litigated. Since you did not specify the jurisdiction, no one here can tell you what the court’s power is in that regard.
Posted 21 January 2013 - 04:48 PM
How do I get clarification as to whether that means ALL 16 admissions or just the 7 being challenged?
Under the circumstances, it seems obvious. However, I obviously haven't read the court's order, so if you think it's not, you should file a motion for clarification. Whether there's a simpler way depends on the laws and court rules in your unidentified state.
If it is all 16 of them including the 9 that were answered properly ...can the judge even do that?
The judge can do anything that he has done, but I suspect that's not really what you intended to ask. If your intent was to ask about legality, that depends on the laws of your unidentified state.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users