Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:37 AM
My great-grandmother passed away a few days, and at the funeral yesterday one of her sons said that she had made a hand-written will a few months before. His wife wrote it, and my great-grandmother signed it. He provided copies to the relatives, and it is her signature. However, in the mid 1990s she had a will filed at an attorneys office, and has never amended it. The hand written will does not mention the previous will. In the hand-written will one relative is lieft out. Which would hold up in court?
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:59 AM
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:08 PM
"However, in the mid 1990s she had a will filed at an attorneys office, and has never amended it."
That isn't relevant if she made a new will that supercedes the old.
"The hand written will does not mention the previous will."
Not necessarily relevant (even if this weren't a matter of it being hand-written).
"Which would hold up in court?"
We cannot know the answer from here simply based on what you've posted. Certainly, the "left out" relative ought to consult with local estate-probate counsel.
Posted 17 January 2013 - 12:38 PM
Some states permit "holographic wills," which basically means a will that is written entirely by the testator (i.e., the person who made the will) and without witnesses. Georgia does not permit holographic wills and, even if it did, the will that was handwritten by your great-grandmother's son would not be valid even though she signed it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users