Jump to content


Photo

Dog Purchase


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 kgiacobbe

kgiacobbe

    New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 17 January 2012 - 09:32 AM

Hi,


-From Florida


Hi,


I was in search of a new dog and wanted a puppy but needed to get an adult because I needed it to be housebroken. I found one on Ebay, the lady said she was housebroken. When I get to her house an hour away, she tells me he has been "outside" the past couple days and then when I got home and told her he was already marking she said I may have to crate train him for a couple days. She said she would take the dog back but not give me my money back. The dog is clearly never been trained, I have done everything and I cannot keep him. I am wondering if I can sue her to give the dog back and give my money back on false terms she put in her ad.



#2 Fallen

Fallen

    Platinum Contributor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 57,292 posts

Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:51 AM

There's no law preventing you from suing her.  We cannot know whether you'll be successful, given it may be hard to prove the purchase was conditioned on the dog being housetrained (assuming that was the deal).  You may want to try and get her (via email) to admit that she agreed to refund the money (you may not legally record a conversation with her in FL unless she knows it's being recorded).

#3 pg1067

pg1067

    Platinum Contributor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 41,436 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:29 AM

Of course you can sue.  Did you really think you couldn't?

#4 pg1067

pg1067

    Platinum Contributor

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 41,436 posts

Posted 18 January 2012 - 02:33 AM

http://forums.prospe.../0/5/quote.icon); PADDING-BOTTOM: 5em; MARGIN: 0.5em; COLOR: #666; LINE-HEIGHT: 1.5em; PADDING-TOP: 0.5em; BACKGROUND-REPEAT: no-repeat; FONT-STYLE: italic; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #f5f5f5">Fallen said...

it may be hard to prove the purchase was conditioned on the dog being housetrained (assuming that was the deal).

The poster wouldn't have to prove this.  All the poster would have to prove would be that the representation made in the ad was false and that he/she reasonably relied on the representation.  The difficulty here would be in proving that the dog wasn't, in fact, housebroken.  I have to assume that a dog that is housebroken for one person might revert to "marking" when brought into a new home.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users